The Aesthetic, Political, And Social Foundations Of Artistic Culture: Classical Philosophy, Political Thought, And The Evolution Of Artistic Patronage
Keywords:
Aesthetics, political philosophy, artistic cultureAbstract
This article presents an extensive theoretical investigation into the aesthetic, political, and social foundations of artistic culture, grounded strictly in classical philosophical sources and twentieth-century scholarship on art, politics, and society. Drawing upon the political philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, the political-theoretical reflections of I. A. Ilyin, and major works in aesthetics and cultural sociology, the study explores how artistic production and aesthetic value are historically shaped by forms of political order, social structure, and systems of patronage. Particular attention is paid to the conceptual opposition between monarchy and republic as cultural frameworks, the mimetic foundations of art, the transformation of artistic labor into a social enterprise, and the structural features of artistic culture under capitalist society. Methodologically, the article employs close textual analysis, comparative philosophical interpretation, and historical-theoretical synthesis. The results demonstrate that artistic culture cannot be adequately understood as an autonomous sphere but must be interpreted as a dynamic system embedded within political authority, economic organization, and evolving concepts of knowledge. The discussion elaborates the implications of these findings for contemporary theory of art, highlighting tensions between artistic autonomy and social determination. The article concludes by reaffirming the enduring relevance of classical and modern theoretical perspectives for understanding the social destiny of art and aesthetic consciousness.
References
Auerbach, E. (1976). Mimesis. Moscow.
Aristotle. (1957). Poetics. Moscow.
Artistic Culture in Capitalist Society. (1986). Leningrad.
Artistic Culture in Capitalist Society. Structural and Typological Research. (1986). Leningrad.
David, L. (1933). Speeches and Letters of the Artist Louis David. Moscow–Leningrad.
Gaidenko, P. P. (1980). Evolution of the Concept of “Science”. Moscow.
Gilbert, K., & Kuhn, G. (2000). History of Aesthetics. Moscow.
Haskell, F. (1963). Patrons and Painters: A Study in the Relations Between Italian Art and Society in the Age of the Baroque. London.
Ilyin, I. A. (1994). Concepts of Monarchy and Republic. Moscow.
Kagan, M. S. (Ed.). (1986). Artistic Culture in Capitalist Society: Structural and Typological Research. Leningrad.
Kavolis, V. (1979). Social evolution of the artist enterprise. In Research in Sociology of Knowledge, Sciences and Art (Vol. 11).
Plato. (1929). Lysis. In Complete Works (Part 1). Moscow.
Plato. (1971). Republic. In Works (Vol. 3, Part 1). Moscow.
Rotenberg, E. (1971). Art of Holland of the 19th Century. Moscow.
Sidney, F. (1981). Justification by poetry. In Aesthetics of the Renaissance (Vol. 2). Moscow.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aleksandr Petrovich Sokolov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.